The Court of Truth

If your student lost money and you didn't, what exactly did you sell him?

This page is not about people; it is about a structure. We start from one principle, arrive at one test, and then place the common revenue models of Iran's trading-education market next to that test — with documented examples taken from the vendors' own websites. No adjective is applied to any person; only what they themselves have published.

01 / THE PRINCIPLE

What is sold is not "education". It is "a profitable method".

Nobody pays for a course to learn what a candlestick is. They pay for one promise: "after this, you will be profitable." So there is exactly one yardstick: does the method's output equal profit, or not. Everything else — hours of video, number of students, production quality, books and apps — is irrelevant to that question.

And if a method is genuinely profitable, it can be written down completely: entry condition, no-entry condition, stop, target, size, risk. Once fully written, it is no longer a "skill"; it is a tool. A tool gives the same output to anyone who executes its instructions. A method that only works in its author's hands is not a method; it is a person. And you cannot sell a person.

What "100% rule-based" means

100% rule-based means 100% reproducible, not 100% winning. A mechanical system has drawdowns and red months too. The difference is that in a red month the author and the executor lose together, and everyone can see it.

02 / THE TEST

The iron test: student loses, teacher profits

One test that needs no further explanation

If the method is complete and mechanical, the teacher's equity curve and the curve of anyone executing the same method must overlap. Now suppose the student lost money. There are only two possibilities:

Case 1: The teacher lost in the same period too. Then he is not profitable himself — so what is he selling?
Case 2: The teacher profited and the student lost. Then what was handed to the student was not the whole method; either the method is incomplete, or it was delivered incomplete. Either way, money was taken for something that does not exist.

The words "psychology", "discipline", "experience" and "mindset" are precisely the labels placed over this gap so that Case 2 stays hidden. They are not excuses; they are confessions — confessions that the method is not transferable. And a method that is not transferable is not sellable either.

My commitment

I only take the trades the system issues, and those same trades are announced in the Telegram channel. My statement equals the system's output — no more, no less. If the system has a bad month, it shows on the public account, exactly as the 33% drawdown did.

03 / ANATOMY OF REVENUE

Common revenue models, with documented examples

Each example comes from the official website or published biography of the vendor itself. The source is linked next to each one so you can check. Whatever this page says about any person is limited to these clickable items.

MODEL A

Free course → paid course → "my trusted broker"

A free beginner course, a paid advanced course, and beside them a sign-up link to a recommended broker. The broker link usually carries a referral code, so the vendor earns from the trading volume of everyone who signs up — whether they win or lose.

Documented example: the homepage of sobhansamadi.com simultaneously offers a "free beginner course", an "advanced course", a book, an expert advisor and a "my trusted broker" link. The performance shown consists of student statement screenshots "after two months of forward testing"; no public, verifiable account of the instructor himself is linked. Source: official site ↗

MODEL B

Paid course + broker referral + "capital allocation" promise

A multi-hour course at a fixed price, a "reliable broker" page with a dedicated sign-up link, and the promise that talented students will later receive funded accounts. The allocation promise creates the motive to buy; the broker revenue continues after the purchase.

Documented example: poursamadi.com sells a 90-part course for 3,000,000 toman, has a "reliable broker" page with a dedicated registration portal, and lists "capital-grant calls for $1,000–$50,000 accounts" among the course benefits. No verified public account of the instructor is on the site. Source: course page ↗ · broker page ↗

MODEL C

Instructor = broker owner = prop-firm owner

The most severe form of conflict of interest. One person teaches, owns the broker the student trades with, and owns the prop firm the student pays for a "challenge". In all three outcomes — learning, trading, or failing the challenge — the revenue flows.

Documented example: the published official biography of Mohammad Ahangari-Asl (ANA news agency) presents him as "founder and CEO of MondFX broker" and "founder and CEO of FeneFX funding company". In the "Live Trade" course on the Ahangari Holding site, episode five provides a discount code for buying a FeneFX prop challenge. The "$100,000 account" claim is not accompanied by a third-party public link. Source: official biography ↗ · course page ↗

MODEL D

"The most complete course" with no performance trace at all

Multi-module courses (price action, techno-fundamental, crypto…) resold across dozens of reseller sites, whose instructor has no public account, no statement and sometimes not even a working website. The product is volume.

Documented example: the "Eco Comprehensive course by Amirhossein Namavar" is sold on reseller sites as "the most complete course"; the official domain given for him (amirnamaavar.ir) showed only an empty server directory listing at the time of this review. No verified public account was found. Source: reseller site ↗

Reviewed 19 September 2026. If any of these vendors has a verified public account that this review missed, email Brakhshani@gmail.com; this page will be corrected and the correction dated.

04 / SIDE BY SIDE

One table, no adjectives

Criterion	This site	Models A–D
Verified public account of the instructor himself	Yes — Myfxbook link, 4+ years, both verification badges	Not found in any of the four examples
Method as closed rules	Yes — mechanical; trades announced in the channel	"Skill", "mindset", "live experience"
When there is a loss	Visible on the public account (33% drawdown on record)	Student: "your psychology was weak"
Revenue from the student's trading (IB / broker / prop)	None	Present in some form in all four models
What is sold on the website	Nothing; a free conversation	Course, book, EA, broker link, prop challenge

05 / THE OPEN DOOR

This page can be invalidated with one link

Any of the vendors named here, or any other instructor in Iran, can invalidate this page. The condition is simple and is the same one I hold myself to:

1: A public link to the instructor's own real account on Myfxbook or FxBlue, broker-verified
2: At least three continuous years
3: The complete rules of the method, in a form another person could execute without the instructor present

Until that day, this page stays. There is no accusation here; only an open door.

My public account The system's rules

This page is the author's personal opinion based on information publicly published by the named vendors themselves and does not attribute any crime or offence to any natural or legal person. Selling courses, referring brokers and owning a prop firm are not in themselves illegal; the subject of this page is conflict of interest and verifiability.